“When
data of any sort are placed in storage, they are filed alphabetically or
numerically, and information is found (when it is) by tracing it down from
subclass to subclass…The human mind does not work that way. It operates by
association. With one item in its grasp, it snaps instantly to the next that is
suggested by the association of thoughts, in accordance with some intricate web
of trails carried by the cells of the brain. It has other characteristics, of
course; trails that are not frequently followed are prone to fade, items are
not fully permanent, memory is transitory. Yet the speed of action, the
intricacy of trails, the detail of mental pictures, is awe-inspiring beyond all
else in nature.” – Vannevar Bush, As We May Think, 1945, p. 43
What
jumps instantly to my mind upon reading this quote is first, agreement–that my
brain navigates subjects by association–and second, the fact that the machine
through which I access or search for a large percentage of the information I
seek–my computer–doesn’t work that way.
You wouldn't know it, but there are thousands and thousands of images scattered throughout these folders. |
My
desktop runs Windows 7, which organizes files (and allows me to choose how to
organize them) into folders. Folders can be nested within each other. For those
of you who are unfamiliar with this operating system, here’s a screenshot of
what my Pictures folder looks like:
I can
move or change these folders any which-way I like. I can delete them, change
their names or put them in a different folder entirely. If I have a file that
falls under more than one of my folder categories, I can copy that file and put
a copy in each location.
The
funny thing I’m noticing as I write this, is that it’s hard for me to describe
what a folder system is really like without referring to the word “folder” as a
unit very frequently. I realize that to us, it probably sounds like a
ridiculous hypothetical to ask how someone with no knowledge of how this
organizational system works would navigate and find the information they’re
looking for on a computer, but I watch my older family members go through this
painful process on a regular basis. I once actually did a physical
demonstration of files/folders–using our filing cabinets at home–to illustrate
the hierarchical nature of how information is organized within Windows.
All images are screenshots made by me. |
Ladies and gentlemen, the hashtag. |
Twitter
is another prime example of how tags are useful. Without the ubiquitous
hashtag, the sheer volume of individual tweets would be impossible to navigate.
Twitter users tend to use hashtags in which they’re interested to find new
people to follow, and I imagine the entire community would be much more
disjointed were it not for the hashtag drawing users together. The
one thing tags don’t really lend themselves to is browsing. They are great for
locating specific items, but if a user simply wants to poke around and see
what’s there, tags might limit search results unnecessarily.
I’d be curious to hear other opinions on this topic. Are tags actually more useful/”better” than the folder system? Are they just a better idea in terms of user interface? I’ve heard a few people describe tags as how we’ll navigate computer folders in “The Future,” and having grown up using Windows, I shudder to think what a chaotic mess my folders would be if I traded that for tagging each file.
No comments:
Post a Comment